t-break Forums: Intel Core i5 Lynnfield 2.66 GHz Tested - t-break Forums

Jump to content

  • (3 Pages) +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic
  • Bookmark

Intel Core i5 Lynnfield 2.66 GHz Tested Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   his_highness Icon

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 42
  • Joined: 16-October 04

Posted 25 May 2009 - 07:27 AM


"Intel's quad-core Core i5 2.66 GHz processor based on the Lynnfield core, was tested on an Intel reference-design P55 motherboard (DIBX_CRB) by forum members of XFastest. The processor accompanies 2.80 GHz and 2.93 GHz variants higher up in the series, and is expected to be priced at US $196.

The test bed was put through 3DMark Vantage (Performance and eXtreme settings), Cinebench R10, Queen, Photoworxx and AES tests of Everest. The GPU is of little relevance, as the CPU test 1 is what is to be looked at. At Queen, the setup with 4 cores and HyperThreading enabled, edged a dual-Xeon L5320 (8 cores) setup. It proved to be roughly 25% faster than Core 2 Extreme QX9650 at Photoworxx, and scored marginally higher than it AES. More pictures of the motherboard at the source."

techPowerUp! News :: Intel Core i5 Lynnfield 2.66 GHz Tested
Q9550 E0 @ 3.8 GHz
Gigabyte P45-UD3R
6GB DDR3
Sapphire HD4890
Zalman 9700NT
22" LG
0

#2 User is offline   oxide Icon

  • Senior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,575
  • Joined: 18-December 02

Posted 30 May 2009 - 09:19 AM

It's pretty crappy that the i5 doesn't share the same socket as the i7. Makes it even harder to switch between the two for whatever reason. :nonono2:
Intel Core i7 920
ThermalRight Ultra 120 Rev.A
MSI Eclipse SLi x58
Corsair XMS3 1333MHz
Gigabyte NVIDIA 9800GTX

Seagate Barracudda 7200.10 1TB x1
Seagate Barracudda 7200.9 300GB x2
Samsung 20" Widescreen LCD
Zalman ZM-600HP 600w

Posted Image
0

#3 User is offline   Intel_P4 Icon

  • Senior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 289
  • Joined: 02-June 05

Posted 30 May 2009 - 10:11 AM

I hope intel actually adds more kinds of CPU's to share the same socket as the i5 otherwise its just not worth it...
0

#4 User is offline   darthoz Icon

  • Sith Mod
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 13,472
  • Joined: 19-April 03

Posted 31 May 2009 - 04:00 AM


One of the reasons I didn't upgrade to Quad Core was due to i7....and now i5?! WTF? And it isn't even backwards compatible?
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 / Gigabyte 3D Galaxy II | Asus P5QL-E | Gigabyte 3D Aurora 570 | 4GB OCZ Reaper + 4GB Kingston | MSI R5770 OC | Creative Audigy 2 ZS | Razer Lycosa, Lachesis, Mantis | Logitech G11, G5, Razer Goliathus | Thermaltake Tough Power 650 W | Creative Inspire T6060 | Viewsonic 20.1" LCD


Apple Power Mac G4 MDD | Dual 867 Mhz | 2 GB DDR | 160 GB HDD | OS X 10.5

0

#5 User is offline   oxide Icon

  • Senior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,575
  • Joined: 18-December 02

Posted 31 May 2009 - 08:51 PM

No it isn't... The new Core i5 & i7 are not backward or cross compatible. That's the only disadvantage over whatever Intel was previously churning out. i7 will remain high end with i5's the mainstream. Stick to a cheapo Core 2 upgrade now, forget quad etc. and go for i5 later if you're not interested in the i7. I told you so...
Intel Core i7 920
ThermalRight Ultra 120 Rev.A
MSI Eclipse SLi x58
Corsair XMS3 1333MHz
Gigabyte NVIDIA 9800GTX

Seagate Barracudda 7200.10 1TB x1
Seagate Barracudda 7200.9 300GB x2
Samsung 20" Widescreen LCD
Zalman ZM-600HP 600w

Posted Image
0

#6 User is offline   N.E.A Icon

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14
  • Joined: 03-June 09

Posted 03 June 2009 - 07:24 AM

but amd is much better than intel in the upgrading ..you know am2+ socket can run am2\am+\am3 so if you have old am2 or am2+ you can always upgrade it with am3 cpu...but inte lga 775 socket is dying ..i read that they are waiting till core 2.. cpus be out of stock and then push the core i5..:stare:
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
0

#7 User is offline   oxide Icon

  • Senior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,575
  • Joined: 18-December 02

Posted 06 June 2009 - 04:15 PM

Core 2 is far from dying... I don't think the end for Core 2 is anywhere near. If i5's are priced extremely well, yes, that may be a selling point. But if that's the case, then who needs the Core 2's? :-)
Intel Core i7 920
ThermalRight Ultra 120 Rev.A
MSI Eclipse SLi x58
Corsair XMS3 1333MHz
Gigabyte NVIDIA 9800GTX

Seagate Barracudda 7200.10 1TB x1
Seagate Barracudda 7200.9 300GB x2
Samsung 20" Widescreen LCD
Zalman ZM-600HP 600w

Posted Image
0

#8 User is offline   N.E.A Icon

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14
  • Joined: 03-June 09

Posted 07 June 2009 - 04:48 AM

but i don`t think they would price the core i5 well because there is too many of core 2.. in the market ..so i think the well price it higher than core 2..but lower than core i7..:dozey:
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
0

#9 User is offline   N.E.A Icon

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14
  • Joined: 03-June 09

Posted 07 June 2009 - 04:52 AM

or if intel is thinking right they sould price most of core i5 better than core 2.. ,and i wanted to say something .if intel want to kill:leer: amd the sould have made the core i5 compatiable with one of these sockets lga775 ..or lga 1366 ..this way they will take the advantage on amd (faster cpus.and easy upgrade)..:leer:
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
0

#10 User is offline   oxide Icon

  • Senior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,575
  • Joined: 18-December 02

Posted 14 June 2009 - 03:31 AM

LOL!!!

bit-tech.net | Confirmed: Core i7 920, 940, 950 to go "soon"
Intel Core i7 920
ThermalRight Ultra 120 Rev.A
MSI Eclipse SLi x58
Corsair XMS3 1333MHz
Gigabyte NVIDIA 9800GTX

Seagate Barracudda 7200.10 1TB x1
Seagate Barracudda 7200.9 300GB x2
Samsung 20" Widescreen LCD
Zalman ZM-600HP 600w

Posted Image
0

  • (3 Pages) +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic
  • Bookmark

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users